Case wrote:
> Kevin Pulo wrote:
>> I have written an essay which takes a blow by blow
>> account of how the Quake Lives release has violated
>> the GPL, providing specifics on where it's gone
>> wrong. Read it at
>
> nice discussion, but it seems to be that not
> including source for DirectX is not a violation of
> the GPL, as it is an external program that is not
> distributed in the same package as games.

[snip]

> Does this make sense? I'm sorta rambling..

Yes, it does, and thanks for pointing it out. You're right, and I'd forgotten about this section of the GPL when I was reading the interface definition file section.

I'll probably take that paragraph out of my essay when I get the chance.

Kev.